SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 598

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vipin Batham – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Arvind Singh Chauhan,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

th

ON THE 13 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 44081 of 2024

VIPIN BATHAM

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Arvind Singh Chauhan - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Brijesh Kumar Tyagi - Public Proseuctor for the respondent

No.1/State.

None for the respondent No.2 though served.

ORDER and thereafter a friendship developed between them. Subsequently, they began talking on the phone, and he used to take her out, expressing his liking for her and assuring her that he intended to marry her. On the basis of such assurance, for the first time on 07.06.2017 at about 12:00 noon, he took her to Safari Hotel, Bajaria, near the Railway Station and established physical relations. Thereafter, on several occasions he took her to the same place and repeatedly established physical relations with her, the last such act allegedly occurred on 27.10.2023. Later, when both families became aware of their relationship and the prosecutrix’s family proposed marriage, the accused’s family refused and when the prosecutrix herself insisted on marriage, the accused also refused, stopped communi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top