SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 601

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rakesh Sethi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Siddharth Datt,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. P. SHARMA

th

ON THE 13 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 19907 of 2024

RAKESH SETHI AND OTHERS

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Eshaan Datt - Advocate for petitioners.

Ms. Shipra Gupta - Panel Lawyer for respondent/State.

Shri Anmol Naik - Advocate for respondent No.2.

ORDER they have settled their dispute amicably. This Court, vide order dated 27.05.2024, directed the Registrar (Judicial-II) of this Court for verification of the compromise entered between the petitioner and complainant/respondent no.2.

This petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

has been preferred by the petitioner seeking quashment of FIR bearing Crime No.128/2024, dated 07.02.2024 (Annexure-P/1), registered at Police Station- Kareli, District-Narsinghpur for offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 409 of IPC as well as quashing of all consequential proceedings arising

therefrom.

2. As per the prosecution story, allegation against the petitioners is that the complainant had a business transaction with the petitioners and complainant delivered grains costing Rs.4,32,43022/- out of which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top