SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 684

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Gourav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sachin Parmar,Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBODH ABHYANKAR

th

ON THE 12 OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 54231 of 2025

GOURAV

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Appearance:

Shri Sachin Parmar - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Bhaskar Agrawal Govt. Adv appearing on behalf of Advocate

General[r-1].

ORDER has been no mistake on his part due to which the trial court should not have framed charges against him. It is further submitted that the main accused persons, who are involved in the offence of theft, have already been granted bail by this Court and the trial court also; whereas it is alleged against the present applicant that he had purchased the stolen jewellery and sold it to some third party and no recovery has been made at his instance. Thus, it is submitted that the applicant deserves to be released on bail.

1] They are heard and perused the case diary/challan papers.

2] This is the second bail application filed by the applicant under

Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as he / she is implicated in connection with Crime No.622/2022, registered at Police Station-Barwah, District-Khargone (Mandleshwar) (MP) for offence punishable under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top