SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 722

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Manoj Kewat(Nishad) – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Pratibha Tripathi – Respondent


Advocates:
Mukesh Kumar Agrawal,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 12 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 2835 of 2019

MANOJ KEWAT(NISHAD) AND OTHERS

Versus

SMT. PRATIBHA TRIPATHI

Appearance:

Shri Utkarsh Agrawal - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Rajneesh Kant Rajak - Advocate for the respondent.

ORDER

The present petition has been filed challenging the order Annexure P-

1 dated 16.05.2019, whereby the trial Court has struck off the defence of the petitioner under Section 13(6) of M.P. accommodation control act on the ground that the tenant has failed to deposit or pay the amount as required by

this provision.

2. Counsel for the petitioner has contended that the summons were

served upon the the petitioner/defendant/tenant on 10.10.2017 and he deposited the entire areas of rent on 16.01.2019. However, the defence has been struck off by the Court on 16.05.2019, but prior to that date, the entire

rent had been deposited by the petitioner-defendant.

3. The trial Court has allowed the application of landlord under

Section 13(6) by noting that though the arrears of rent have been deposited,

but thereafter the monthly rent has not been properly deposited within time.

4. The cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top