SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 755

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sudhir Singh Kushwah – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Prashant Sharma,Sarvesh Sharma,Devendra Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT

th

ON THE 12 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 3878 of 2012

SUDHIR SINGH KUSHWAH

Versus

STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Siddharth Sharma - learned counsel for petitioner.

Shri Rajendra Jain - learned Government Advocate for

respondent/State.

ORDER Disciplinary Authority appointed the Enquiry Officer; however, no Presenting Officer was appointed by the Disciplinary Authority. The entire enquiry was conducted by Enquiry Officer himself, who acted as the Presenting Officer. It is further submitted that the Disciplinary Authority supplied a copy of the Enquiry Report, and the petitioner submitted a detailed reply to Annexure P/5 dated 09.05.2010. Thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority passed an order dated 10.07.2010, which is non-

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:-

" It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that the instant

petition

may kindly be allowed and a writ of mandamus and/or a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ be issued against the respondent and following reliefs may

kindly be granted:-

i-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top