SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 760

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sandeep Kar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sapan Usrethe[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA

&

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 9 OF JANUARY, 2026

REVIEW PETITION No. 2 of 2026

SANDEEP KAR

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Sapan Usrethe - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Abhijeet Awasthi - Dy. Advocate General for the

respondents/State.

ORDER at the relevant point of time.

Per: Justice Vivek Rusia

The petitioner has filed the review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 of

the CPC, 1908, seeking review of judgment dated 27.11.2025 (Annexure

RP/1), whereby W.P. No.112/2012 was dismissed.

2. The petitioner is seeking review of the order dated 27.11.2025 on

various grounds, which have already been argued at the time of the hearing of the writ petition. Therefore, reappreciation of the grounds by way of a

review petition is not permissible.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the documents

(Annexure RJ-1 and RJ-2) were not considered while deciding the writ petition, which shows that the petitioner was no more a Director of the firm

4. We have dismissed the writ petition by observing that the petitioner did not file any resolution passed by the Board, in which the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top