SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 763

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Uday Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Seth – Respondent


Advocates:
Abhisehk Singh Bhadauria[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

ON THE 9th OF JANUARY, 2026

MISC. PETITION No. 7269 of 2025

UDAY PRATAP SINGH

Versus

SANJAY SETH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Abhisehk Singh Bhadauria - Advocate for petitioner- plaintiff.

Shri Rinkesh Goyal- Govt. Advocate for respondent no.2/State on advance notice.

ORDER claimed that the disputed portion falls within his adjoining land. He further contended that the petitioner had incorrectly shown the boundaries and lacked any right over the disputed portion.

This Miscellaneous Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been

filed by the petitioner–plaintiff challenging the legality, propriety, and correctness of the order dated 04.12.2025 passed by the Second Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ashok Nagar, in RCSA No. 113 of 2020, wherein the trial court rejected the objections raised by the petitioner

regarding the report submitted by the Commissioner.

2. In brief, the petitioner instituted a civil suit seeking declaration of title, permanent

injunction, and removal of encroachment concerning land bearing Survey No. 172/3 Min-3, measuring 0.007 hectare (750 square feet), located at Isagarh–Ashoknaga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top