IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA

th

ON THE 9 OF JANUARY, 2026

REVIEW PETITION No. 278 of 2019

KALURAM

Versus

NARAYAN AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Abhishek Gulatee - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Aryan Shukla - Advocate for the respondents.

ORDER explain the following errors apparent on the face of the impugned order passed in the second appeal.

The petitioner has filed this review petition under Section 114 CPC,

read with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, for review of the judgment and decree dated

17.01.2019, passed in Second Appeal No.633/2016.

2. A decree of specification of contract was passed by the Trial Court

in favour of the plaintiff/appellant in the Civil Suit, and the same was reversed by the First Appellate Court vide judgment and decree dated 29.02.2016. Thereafter, the Second Appeal was filed by the plaintiff/

appellant before this court.

3. The appellant has drafted the review as an appeal, but the review is

liable to be entertained only if the error is apparent on the face of the record. Even the wrong order/ judgment is liable to be reviewed. This court has decided the second appeal on merit because no substantial question of law was found