SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 785

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dr.V.P.Khare – Appellant
Versus
Ku.Monika – Respondent


Advocates:
,Anil Mangal,Rajkumar Mishra,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA

th

ON THE 9 OF JANUARY, 2026

CIVIL REVISION No. 137 of 2011

DR.V.P.KHARE

Versus

KU.MONIKA AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Rohit Bansal, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Yogesh Chaturvedi, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Shri Sanjay Singh Kushwaha, Government Advocate for respondent

No.3/State.

ORDER plaintiff that because of medical negligence of applicant and respondent No. 2, she has suffered an amputation of her right hand. A prayer under section 35 of the Court Fees Act was also made on the ground that the yearly income of the minor plaintiff is less than the income specified in the notification issued under section 35 of the Court Fees Act.

This civil revision, under section 115 of CPC, has been filed against

the order dated 25/8/2011 passed by II Additional District Judge (FTC), Ganjbasoda, in MJC No.6/2008, by which respondent No.1, who is minor plaintiff, has been exempted from payment of Court-fee and has been

permitted to pursue the suit as an indigent person.

2. This Court, by interim order dated 18/5/2012, had stayed further

proceedings of civil suit. Record of trial Court has also been requisitioned.

3. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top