SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 801

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Satish Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Neeraj Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Jai Prakash Mishra,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA

th

ON THE 8 OF JANUARY, 2026 SECOND APPEAL No. 26 of 2024

SATISH KUMAR JAIN

Versus

NEERAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Gaurav Mishra, Advocate for the appellant.

Shri Sarvesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondents

ORDER suit for eviction was filed on various grounds. The trial Court by judgment dated dated 26/6/2023 passed in RCSA No.54/2020 dismissed the suit, which has been set aside by the appellate Court and a decree under section 12(1)(a) of Act has been passed.

This second appeal, under section 100 of CPC, has been filed against the

judgment and decree dated 14/12/2023 passed by Principal District Judge, Ashoknagar in RCA No.33/2023, by which judgment and decree dated 26/6/2023 passed by I Additional Judge to the Court of I Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ashoknagar in RCSA No.54/2020 has been set aside and decree for eviction under section 12(1)(a) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act (for short "the Act") has

been passed by the appellate Court.

2. By order dated 10/1/2024, this appeal was admitted on the following

substantial question of law:-

"Whether learned appellate erred in recording the perv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top