SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 804

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anurag Mohan Varma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ravi Shankar Saini,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA

th

ON THE 8 OF JANUARY, 2026

WRIT PETITION No. 6029 of 2023

ANURAG MOHAN VARMA

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Ravi Shankar Saini - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Vineet Singh - Govt. Advocate for the respondents/ State.

Shri Tarandeep Singh Ajmani - Advocate through VC with Shri

Monish Raghuwanshi, Advocate for the respondent no. 3.

ORDER reply denying the contentions made in the aforesaid application and contending that the disputed properties are not divided between the brothers of the deceased and without deciding the title, the property cannot be recorded in the name of the respondents. The petitioner has also filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC for rejection of the application filed by the respondents. Respondent no. 3 Rajesh Verma filed reply to the application filed by the petitioner stating that the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC are not applicable and prayed for dismissal of the application filed by the petitioner. After hearing the rival contentions of both the parties, the respondent no. 2 Nazul officer dismissed the application under Order 7

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top