SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 807

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pankaj Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
S.K.Sharma,Assistant Solicitor General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHISH SHROTI

th

ON THE 8 OF JANUARY, 2026

WRIT PETITION No. 11686 of 2021

PANKAJ CHAUHAN

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri S. K. Sharma - learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Praveen Kumar Newaskar- learned Deputy Solicitor General for

respondent no.1.

Smt. Monica Mishra - learned Government Advocate for respondent

no.2/State.

Shri Devendra Choubey- learned counsel for respondent no.3.

ORDER namely State of Madhya Pradesh and State of Chhattisgarh w.e.f. 01/11/2000. The General Administration Department of Government of Madhya Pradesh issued guidelines to be followed while allocating the employees of various departments to the successor States, vide circular dated 22/03/2001 (Annexure P/3). The guidelines in nutshell has categorized the employees in four categories as under:-

1. The petitioner has filed this petition challenging order dated

05/07/2006 (Annexure-P/11) and 14/06/2021 (Annexure-P/1) whereby the representation submitted by him against his allocation to the State of

Chhattisgarh has been rejected.

2. The facts necessary for decision of this case are that the petitioner is

working as Sub-Engineer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top