SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 813

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
State Of M.P. – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate General,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 8 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 1614 of 2010

STATE OF M.P.

Versus

RAGHUNATH SINGH AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Anil Babu Mangal - Government Advocate for the

appellant/State.

Shri Bal Krishna Agrawal- Advocate for the respondent No.2.

ORDER Mayana, Guna the vehicle ahead suddenly stopped, as a result of which the claimant’s vehicle hit the said vehicle from behind, causing damage to the claimant’s vehicle. Incident was reported to the police. FIR was registered. After registration of FIR and other formalities, charge sheet has been filed. Thereafter, claimant filed the claim petition. Respondents filed their written statements and denied all the claim averments.

This Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988 has been filed by the appellant/State challenging the impugned award dated 20.07.2010 passed by the Second Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gwalior (M.P.) in Claim Case No.11/2009, whereby the learned Claims Tribunal rejected the claim petition filed by the

appellant/State.

2. Brief facts of the case, as pleaded by the appellant, are that on

21.08.2007 at abo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top