SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 815

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ku.Ritu – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Rajak – Respondent


Advocates:
Prem Kishor Rathor,Anan Sahu,H.K.Goyal,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT GWALIOR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 8 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 1429 of 2010

KU.RITU AND OTHERS

Versus

VINOD RAJAK AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri R.P.Gupta, Shri Sudesh Bhadoriya and Shri Akhilesh Gupta - Advocate

for the appellants/claimants.

Shri Kamal Kumar Rochalani-Advocate for respondent No.6/New India

Insurance Company.

Shri Om Prakash Mathur-Advocate for respondent No.5.

Shri Naresh Singh Tomar-Advocate for respondent No.3/Bajal Alians

General Insurance Company.

ORDER Tribunal on these aspects have attained finality and are not under challenge in the present appeal.

This miscellaneous appeal has been preferred by the appellants/claimants

under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, assailing the award dated 09.07.2010 passed by the First Additional Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gwalior (M.P.) in Claim Case No. 43/2008, whereby the claim petition was partly allowed. The present appeal has been filed seeking enhancement of the

compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal.

2. The factum of accident, negligence of the offending vehicle, and liability

of the respondents are not in dispute. The findings recorded by the Cl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top