SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 830

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sanjay Balai @ Kalu @ Sanju – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Saurabh Sunder,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI

th

ON THE 7 OF JANUARY, 2026

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2027 of 2013 SANJAY BALAI @ KALU @ SANJU

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Appearance:

Ms. Mamta Dubey - Amicus Curiae for appellant.

Ms. Rashi Dua - Panel Lawyer for State.

JUDGMENT court of session from where it was made over to Sessions Judge, Bhopal (M.P.) for trial.

This appeal has been filed by the present appellant being aggrieved by

the judgment dated 05.01.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Judge No.2, Bhopal (M.P.), in Sessions Trial No. 678 of 2011 whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer four years

rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.20,000/-, with default stipulation.

2. As per the prosecution case, on 02.08.2010, the complainant, Neeta

Gupta, approached the police station and lodged a complaint stating that while she was purchasing vegetables from a street vendor in front of her house, an unknown motorcyclist came from behind and forcibly snatched her

gold chain from her neck and fled from the spot.

3. After completion of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top