SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 874

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rohit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sameer Anant Athawale[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR

rd

ON THE 23 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 48726 of 2025 ROHIT KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sameer Anant Athawale, Advocate with Shri Ronak Badawaya, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Ayushyaman Choudhary, Govt. Advocate for the respondent No.1/State.

Shri Tanuj Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent [R-2].

ORDER The present petition is being filed under section 439(2) of Cr.P.C./Section

483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondents No.2 - Meharban Singh, vide order dated 16.03.2023, passed in Cri.A. No.3498/2023 in connection with FIR/Crime No.414/2022 registered at Police Station - Susner, District Agar Malwa(M.P.) for offence punishable under Sections 307, 325, 294, 506, 34, 302 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)s), 3(2)(V), 3(2)(VA) of the Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe(Prevention of Atrocities)Act, 1989.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the petition, contends that the respondents No.2 - Meharban Singh was extended benefit of an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top