SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 906

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Badan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Santhosh – Respondent


Advocates:
Om Prakash Singhal,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

rd

ON THE 23 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 1035 of 2015 BADAN SINGH AND OTHERS Versus SANTHOSH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Om Prakash Singhal - Advocate for the appellants.

Shri Kamal Kumar Rochalani - Advocate for respondent No.3.

Shri Ramesh Prasad Gupta- Advocate for respondent No.1.

ORDER

1. The present matter pertains to a miscellaneous appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the Award dated 22.08.2014 passed by the Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, District Bhind in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 43/2012.

2. The appellants/claimants have filed an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (IA No. 5061 of 2015) seeking condonation of delay in filing the present appeal.

3. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants are illiterate rural persons and were bona fide misled by their previous counsel, who wrongly advised them that there was no limitation for filing an appeal in a motor accident claim case and further assured them that the appeal had already been filed. It is submitted that the appellants remained under such bona

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top