SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 941

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Arpit Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Kotal Mahindra Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
Shailendra Singh[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA

nd

ON THE 22 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 1447 of 2026 ARPIT THAKUR Versus KOTAL MAHINDRA BANK AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Shailendra Singh - Advocate for the petitioner.

ORDER This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article

226 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs:

"a) This petition may kindly be allowed with cost.

b) To direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 thereby directing respondent No. 1 to remove the hold/freeze on the Bank account of petitioner.

c) To declare the freezing of the petitioners’ bank account as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution of India.

d) To direct the respondents to compensate the petitioner for the financial hardship mental agony, and business losses suffered due to the illegal freezing of their bank account.

e) Issue such other orders, writ, and direction as this Hon’ble court deems fit in the interest of justice in favour of petitioner."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top