SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 942

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pramod Sadani – Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Katiya – Respondent


Advocates:
Manish Kumar Vijaywargiya,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI ON THE 22nd OF JANUARY, 2026 CIVIL REVISION No. 33 of 2026 PRAMOD SADANI Versus MUKESH KATIYA AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Manish Kumar Vijaywargiya - Advocate for the petitioner.

ORDER This Civil Revision has been preferred being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 19.12.2025 (Annexure A/1) passed in Execution Case No. 27/2025 whereby the learned Executing Court has dismissed the application for execution as decree has already been executed and earlier possession of the disputed land was delivered to the decree holder.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in Civil Suit No. 9A/2014 which was passed for declaration, possession and permanent injunction was decreed on 28.09.2016 and suit was decreed for all the reliefs claimed. In execution proceedings, the possession of the disputed land bearing survey Nos. 1223, 1224, 1225, 1226, 1227, 1228, 1229, 1230, total area 0.916 hectare was given to the petitioner/decree holder on 09.05.2025 (Annexure A/5). Learned counsel further submits that there is no time limit for filing execution proceedings if the judgment debtor interferes in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top