SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 952

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Mamta Shukla – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate General,Brijendrakumar Mishra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK AWASTHI

nd

ON THE 22 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT APPEAL No. 3669 of 2025 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus MAMTA SHUKLA AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Shrey Raj Saxena, learned counsel for the appellant.

Shri Prasanna R. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the respondent/writ petitioner.

ORDER Per: Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla Heard on IA No.11576/2025, which is an application for condonation of delay.

The delay in filing the appeal is duly explained in the application, which is well supported by an affidavit; therefore, the application is allowed.

Delay is condoned.

Also heard on the question of admission.

The present writ appeal is filed under section 2(1) of Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaay (Khand Nyaypeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 against the order dated 23.04.2024 passed in WP No.11524/2020, whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition and quashed the recovery of Rs.1,23,910/- from Writ Petitioner No.1 and Rs. 8,45,875/- from Writ Petitioner No.2, referring to the judgment passed by the this court in the cases of State of MP Vs. Jagdish Prasad Dubey passed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top