SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1110

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Lakshit – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vikas Jain[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH

th

ON THE 20 OF JANUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 34 of 2026 LAKSHIT Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Vikas Jain - Advocate for the petitioner [P-1].

Shri Rajendra Singh Suryavanshi - Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State.

ORDER This criminal revision under section 438 & 442 of the BNSS, 2025 is preferred challenging the legality of the order dated 10.12.2025 in SCNDPS No.8133/2024 by Special Judge (NDPS Act, 1985), Mandsaur, whereby in the above mentioned special case arising out of crime no.43/2024 registered at police station, Narcotics Cell, Indore, Prakosth Mandsaur whereby the application filed by the appellant under Section 94, 95 of BNSS for calling the cell phone tower location records of the respondent police officers and the accused persons has been rejected.

2. As per prosecution case, the revision petitioner/accused along with co-accused Harish was apprehended at 4.00 p.m of 18.05.2024 near village Beniphati on Daulat-Bhavnagar Road with the contraband 100 gms MD and 50 grams of Opium and the prosecution was initiated.

3. The revision petitioner preferred an applica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top