SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1121

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ram Prakash Bais – Appellant
Versus
Redhey Shyam Shah – Respondent


Advocates:
Prabhakar Singh[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI

th

ON THE 20 OF JANUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 12075 of 2025 RAM PRAKASH BAIS Versus REDHEY SHYAM SHAH Appearance:

Shri Kamlesh Patel - Advocate for appellant.

ORDER This appeal has been filed under Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by “victim” of an offence as defined under Section 138 of N.I. Act against judgment dated 18.03.2025 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Baidhan, District Singrauli (M.P.) in Case No.161 of 2016, whereby respondent/accused has been acquitted of an offence under Section 138 of N.I.

Act.

2. Aforesaid criminal case was instituted on the basis of private complaint filed by the victim/appellant.

3. The question before this Court is whether instant appeal is covered under proviso to section 413 of BNSS (372 of Cr.P.C.).

4. The aforesaid issue is no longer res integra in light of the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025 SCC Online SC 1320. The issue arose in said adjudication was whether an appeal would be maintainable under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Proc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top