SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1151

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vinod @ Suraj Panika – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sharad Singh Baghel,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RATNESH CHANDRA SINGH BISEN

th

ON THE 20 OF JANUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 8494 of 2023 VINOD @ SURAJ PANIKA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Sharad Singh Baghel, learned counsel for the appellant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, learned Public Prosecutor for the State.

JUDGEMENT Per: Justice Vivek Agarwal Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of I.A.

No.20514/2023, which is first application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant - Vinod @ Suraj Panika.

2. Accordingly, I.A. No.20514/2023 is dismissed as withdrawn.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, case is heard finally.

4. This appeal is filed being aggrieved of the judgment dated 04.11.2022 passed by learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, District Sidhi (M.P.) in ST No.37/2019 whereby learned Trial Court has convicted and sentenced the appellant Vinod @ Suraj Panika in the following manner:-

Conviction Sentence Imprisonment Section Act Imprisonment Fine in lieu of fine R.I. R.I for 6

363 I.P.C. Rs.1,000/-

for 3 years months

366 I.P.C. R.I. for 7 years Rs.2,000/- R.I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top