SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1256

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Shubham – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Arshad Ahmed Mansoori[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA

th

ON THE 19 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 1078 of 2026 SHUBHAM Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Arshad Ahmed Mansoori - Advocate for the petitioner.

ORDER This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article

226 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs:

"a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing Respondent No. 4 (Bank of Maharastra, Godha Colony Branch) to segregate ‘the disputed amount of Rs.500 into a fixed deposit subject to the investigation outcome and to immediately release and permit the petitioner to operate the remaining funds in bank account No: 60526125346 without any hindrance;

b) Direct Respondent No. 3 (Inspector of Police, Namakkal Police Station) to complete all legal proceedings before the jurisdictional Magistrate within a stipulated time frame failing which, direct the release of the disputed sum of Rs.500 to the petitioner;

c) Pass a direction restraining Respondents from arbitrarily freezing entire bank ‘accounts on account of alleged minor suspicious transactions

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top