SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1289

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anup Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Neelam Sisodiya[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

th

ON THE 19 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 55593 of 2025 ANUP SINGH Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Shashank Kumar Jain - Advocate (through VC) alongwith Shri Aditya Dixit - Advocate for the applicant.

Ms. Anjali Gyanani - Public Prosecutor for the State.

ORDER The present application has been filed by the complainant under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking cancellation of bail granted to Respondent No.2/accused by this Court vide order dated 20.08.2025 in connection with offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The relevant extract of aforesaid bail order reads as under:

"Heard counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

The bail is manifestation of right to liberty which cannot be deprived of on uncertain factors where especially delay is not attributed to the accused. Speedy trial is concomitant of right to life and personal liberty which appears to have been beached in the present case as trial is pending since long and the petitioner has suffered pre trial detention of about more than one year.

C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top