SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1305

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Brajvanshi Lal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sameer Kumar Shrivastava[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

th

ON THE 19 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 47532 of 2025 BRAJVANSHI LAL Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Sameer Kumar Shrivastava - Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Kalpana Parmar - PL for the respondent/State.

ORDER The instant petition under Section 528 of BNSS is directed against the order dated 09.10.2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Datia in Session Trial No.79/2024, whereby an application filed by the prosecution for bringing a CD on record, has been allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the impugned order suffers from perversity and illegality in so far as it is not in consonance with the provisions on which reliance has been placed by the Court below. It is further submitted that if at all there was any recording of the incident seized at the very inception, it would have been mentioned in the seizure memos of the petitioners or of the spot, but from bare perusal of the seizure memos, it is not evident that any such camara or footage was ever seized. It was further submitted that even in the statements of prosecu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top