SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1480

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Kamal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Yash Sharma[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH

th

ON THE 16 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 38460 of 2025 KAMAL KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Yash Sharma - Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms.Smrati Sharma - Govt. Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER Heard on the question of admission.

The instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India claims the following reliefs:

"(a) That, respondent authorities may kindly be directed to conduct the enquiry against the erring revenue officers who are responsible for making willful interference in the land in question in utter disregard to the judgment passed by this Hon’ble Court in S.A. No. 2432/2024.

(b) That, respondent authorities may kindly be directed to take affirmative steps in pursuance of representations given by the petitioner.

(c) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit may also kindly be granted."

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in spite of the fact that respondent No.6 has lost up to this Court in Second Appeal No.2432/2024 (Annexure-P/4) with respect to the issue of title, possession and permanent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top