SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1525

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Mano Bai – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Rameshwar Dayal Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT th ON THE 15 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 4681 of 2017 SMT. MANO BAI Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Ajay Bhargava - Advocate for petitioner.

Shri K.K. Prajapati – Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed seeking following relief(s):-

“(i) That, respondents may kindly be directed to correct the superannuated dated 14.06.2019 in place to 14.06.2017 in her service record.

(ii) That, the respondent no. 2 may kindly be directed to permitted the petitioner to discharge her duty in Aganwadi Sahayika in Village Bilowa Tehsil Pohari District Shivpuri, (iii) That, appointment of respondent no. 5 Mamta Jatav in Aganwadi Sahiyaka in Village Bilowa may kindly be set aside.

(iv) That, the other relief doing justice including cost be awarded.”

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that by virtue of order dated 25.03.2017 petitioner was superannuated on 14.06.2017. It is submitted that petitioner was wrongly declared as superannuated because petitioner's age was not 60 years. It is s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top