SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1609

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Satendra Singh Parmar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Singh[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA

th

ON THE 30 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 941 of 2026 SATENDRA SINGH PARMAR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Indra Singh Ashthana - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Dinesh Savita - PP for the State.

Shri Girraj Soni - Advocate for the respondent No.2.

ORDER The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section

528 of the BNSS seeking quashment of FIR bearing Crime No.486/2024 registered at Police Station- Kotwali, District -Morena for the offence under Sections 110 of BNS and consequential proceedings arising thereto on the basis of compromise.

2. It appears that parties agreed to settle the matter and therefore, applications vide I.A. No.296/2026 and I.A. No.297/2026 have been preferred at the instance of parties and they want to settle the matter. The applications are duly signed by respective parties and same are supported by their affidavits.

3. The Principal Registrar of this Court has duly verified the parties, contents of applications, intent and signatures of parties. Report is attached, same is perused and it appears that compro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top