HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ravindra Singh Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Bhupendra Singh Raghuvanshi – Respondent
MCRC 8333/2017
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:3711
1 MCRC-8333-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
th
ON THE 29 OF JANUARY, 2026
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 8333 of 2017
RAVINDRA SINGH SAHU
Versus
BHUPENDRA SINGH RAGHUVANSHI AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri Abhishek Jat - Advocate for petitioner.
ORDER
The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated
07.07.2017 passed by the learned First Additional Sessions Judge,
Ashoknagar in Criminal Revision No. 35/2016, whereby the criminal
revision preferred by the petitioner was dismissed. The said revision had
been filed challenging the order dated 07.09.2016 passed by the learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ashoknagar, by which the unregistered private
complaint submitted by the petitioner under Section 200 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure was dismissed. Thus, both the aforesaid orders are under
challenge in the present petition.
2. In brief, the case of the complainant is that the agricultural land
belonging to the father of the complainant/applicant is situated at Village
Kherbhan, District Ashoknagar. The complainant is in possession of the said
land and is cultivating and maintaining the same. Several trees of different
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: YOGENDRA
OJHA
Signing time: 1/30/2026
3:39:13 PM
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:3711
2 MCRC-8333-2017
species were planted by the father of the complainant on the said land.
Adjacent to the said agricultural land, a non-metallic road is situated, where
construction work under the Government Scheme Pradhan Mantri Gram
Sadak Yojana was being carried out by the respondents. On the date of the
incident, the respondent persons, along with other associates, illegally
entered upon the land of the complainant and cut down several trees standing
thereon, and also removed and took away the same. Upon receiving
information regarding the said illegal acts, the complainant immediately
reached the spot along with his mother. At that time, the respondents abused
the complainant and his mother in filthy language and also pushed them,
thereby causing insult and criminal intimidation. The complainant reported
the aforesaid incident to the local police authorities; however, no action has
been taken by the police till date. Consequently, the complainant/petitioner
filed a private complaint before the competent Court seeking initiation of
criminal proceedings against the respondents. The learned Trial Court, after
recording the statement of the complainant and after considering the police
report, erroneously concluded that no offence was made out and dismissed
the complaint vide order dated 07.09.2016. Aggrieved by the said order, the
complainant preferred Criminal Revision No. 35/2016 before the Court of
First Additional Sessions Judge, which too came to be dismissed vide order
dated 07.07.2017. Being aggrieved by both the aforesaid orders, the present
petition has been preferred.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned orders
passed by the Learned Trial Court as well as by the Learned Revisional
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: YOGENDRA
OJHA
Signing time: 1/30/2026
3:39:13 PM
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:3711
3 MCRC-8333-2017
Court are based on arbitrary, perverse and erroneous findings and, therefore,
deserve to be set aside in the interest of justice.
4. It is further submitted that the courts below have failed to appreciate
the evidence and material available on record in its proper perspective and
have dismissed the complaint and revision mechanically without assigning
cogent and sustainable reasons. The Learned Trial Court has disbelieved the
statements of the petitioner and his relatives; however, while doing so, it has
not recorded any specific reasons or findings to justify such disbelief. It is
well settled that rejection of testimony must be supported by logical
reasoning, and in the absence of any such reasoning, the find
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.