SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1716

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Vijaylaxmi – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Rajlaxmi – Respondent


Advocates:
Tehjeeb Khan[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI

th

ON THE 28 OF JANUARY, 2026 CIVIL REVISION No. 36 of 2026 SMT. VIJAYLAXMI AND OTHERS Versus SMT. RAJLAXMI AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Tehjeeb Khan - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Gajendra Singh Dodia - Govt. Advocate for the respondent No.

16/State.

ORDER This Civil Revision has been preferred under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 assailing the impugned order dated 14.11.2025 passed on application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC in Civil Suit No. RCS- A/29/2025 wherein the said application has been rejected by the learned trial Court.

0 2 . Facts of the case are that plaintiff has filed the suit RCS-

A/29/2025 claiming relief of declaration of title, partition, possession and permanent injunction in respect of agricultural land bearing survey No. 259/1, situated at Mandleshwar, Dist. Khargone which has been shown as agricultural land.

03. Learned counsel for the petitioner inviting attention of this Court towards pleading in para-14 of the plaint itself reveals that land in question is not agricultural land, but it is a diverted land and residential premises and colony has been d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top