##PAGE1##

1 RP-18-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

AT JABALPUR

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA

&

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 28 OF JANUARY, 2026

REVIEW PETITION No. 10 of 2026

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Versus

LAXMI NARAYAN MEWADA RAJPUT

Appearance:

Shri Narinder Pal Singh Ruprah - Senior Advocate with Ms. Prashansa

Baluapuri and Shri Navtej Singh Ruprah - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri E.N. Siddiqui - Advocate for the respondent.

WITH

REVIEW PETITION No. 11 of 2026

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Versus

BAHADUR SINGH POUDLAL

Appearance:

Shri Narinder Pal Singh Ruprah - Senior Advocate with

Ms. Prashansa Baluapuri and Shri Navtej Singh Ruprah - Advocate for

the petitioners.

Shri E.N. Siddiqui - Advocate for the respondent.

REVIEW PETITION No. 12 of 2026

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Versus

Signature Not Verified

Signed by: SHRUTI JHA

Signing time: 30-01-

2026 18:04:20

2 RP-18-2026

KAPIL CHANDOL

Appearance:

Shri Narinder Pal Singh Ruprah - Senior Advocate with

Ms. Prashansa Baluapuri and Shri Navtej Singh Ruprah - Advocate for

the petitioners.

Shri E.N. Siddiqui - Advocate for the respondent.

REVIEW PETITION No. 13 of 2026

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Versus

H.G.P. THAKUR (HARGOVIND PURIYA THAKUR )

Appearance:

Shri Narinder Pal Singh Ruprah - Senior Advocate with

Ms. Prashansa Baluapuri and Shri Navtej Singh Ruprah - Advocate for

the petitioners.

Shri E.N. Siddiqui - Advocate for the respondent.

REVIEW PETITION No. 15 of 2026

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Versus

PRASHANT KUMAR DEHARIYA AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Narinder Pal Singh Ruprah - Senior Advocate with

Ms. Prashansa Baluapuri and Shri Navtej Singh Ruprah - Advocate for

the petitioners.

Shri Harshit Bori - Advocate for the respondents.

REVIEW PETITION No. 17 of 2026

Signature Not Verified

Signed by: SHRUTI JHA

Signing time: 30-01-

2026 18:04:20

3 RP-18-2026

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Versus

SUNIL SONWANE AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Narinder Pal Singh Ruprah - Senior Advocate with

Ms. Prashansa Baluapuri and Shri Navtej Singh Ruprah - Advocate for

the petitioners.

Ms. Priyal Rahangdale - Advocate for the respondent No.1.

Shri Naman Mishra - Advocate for the respondent No.2.

REVIEW PETITION No. 18 of 2026

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Versus

ANOOP RAIKWAR AND OTHERS

Appearance:

Shri Narinder Pal Singh Ruprah - Senior Advocate with

Ms. Prashansa Baluapuri and Shri Navtej Singh Ruprah - Advocate for

the petitioners.

Shri Harshit Bori - Advocate for the respondents.

REVIEW PETITION No. 9 of 2026

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Versus

V.K GOUR VIKAS KUMAR GOUR

Appearance:

Shri Narinder Pal Singh Ruprah - Senior Advocate with

Ms. Prashansa Baluapuri and Shri Navtej Singh Ruprah - Advocate for

the petitioners.

Signature Not Verified

Signed by: SHRUTI JHA

Signing time: 30-01-

2026 18:04:20

4 RP-18-2026

Shri E.N. Siddiqui - Advocate for the respondent.

ORDER

Per: Justice Vivek Rusia

The petitioners have filed the present review petitions seeking review

of the order dated 26.11.2025 passed in Writ Appeal No.3045/2024 and

connected appeals.

2. This Court, while passing the impugned order, had already heard

Shri Narinder Pal Singh Ruprah, Senior Advocate, at length and decided the

writ appeals on merit. Each and every ground advanced by the learned Sr.

Counsel for the appellant was duly considered by this Court.

3. Review petition is not a regular remedy to challenge each and every

order passed by the court. Even the wrong order cannot be reviewed if there

is no apparent error in it. The application for review should not have been

filed in routine manner just to take one more chance to try before the same

court. It causes a burden on the litigen especially when the party is a

government institution, and also wastes the courts' valuable time.

4. In the case of Shri Ram Sahu v. Vinod Kumar Rawat , reported

in (2021) 13 SCC 1, the Hon'ble Apex Court has considered the scope of

review as unde