HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Khalk Singh – Appellant
Versus
Govind Singh – Respondent
WP 4365/2012
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:3502
1 WP-4365-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH
th
ON THE 28 OF JANUARY, 2026
WRIT PETITION No. 4365 of 2012
KHALK SINGH & Ors.
Versus
GOVIND SINGH & Ors.
Appearance:
Shri Arun Dudawat - Advocate for the petitioners.
Shri Upendra Yadav - Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 5.
Shri Sanjay Singh Kushwah - Govt. Advocate for the respondents
No.6 to 8/State.
ORDER
1. The instant writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the
Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 26.03.2012 passed in
revision preferred by the respondents No.1 to 5 by Additional Collector,
District Ashoknagar thereby, dismissing the first appeal preferred by the
petitioners against the order of mutation dated 30.04.2011 passed by the
Tehsildar, Mungawali. District Ashoknagar.
2. Brief facts leading to filing of the instant writ petition are as
under:-
2.1 On the strength of a Will executed in favour of the respondents No.
1 to 5 in respect of lands bearing survey No.30/1 admeasuring 0.600 hectare,
survey No.31 admeasuring 0.282 hectare, survey No.50/1 admeasuring 1.045
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: VANDANA
VERMA
Signing time: 30-Jan-26
10:43:00 AM
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:3502
2 WP-4365-2012
hectare and survey No.15 admeasuring 5.769 hectare, situated at village
Pandau by one Devi Singh, an application under Sections 109 and 110 of
M.P.Land Revenue Code, 1959 seeking mutation of the land in question
came to be filed before the Tehsildar, Mungawali, District Ashoknagar. An
objection as regards maintainability of mutation proceedings on the basis of
a Will was taken by the petitioners herein, yet the Tehsildar vide order dated
30.04.2011 allowed the application filed by the respondents No. 1 to 5. An
appeal under Section 44(1) of the M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 came to
be filed by the petitioners herein before the SDO, Pargana Mungawali,
District Ashoknagar. In the said appeal, an application under Order 7 Rule 11
CPC seeking dismissal of the appeal on the ground of non-joinder of all
parties before the Tehsildar as party respondents in the appeal was filed by
the respondents No. 1 to 5. The said objection filed by the respondents No. 1
to 5 was rejected by the SDO vide order dated 13.12.2011 and the matter was
fixed for final arguments. Thereafter, the respondents No. 1 to 5 invoked the
revisional jurisdiction under Section 50 of the M.P. Land Revenue Code,
1959 before the Additional Collector, District Ashoknagar against the order
dated 13.12.2011 passed by the SDO which came to be allowed vide order
dated 26.03.2012 whereby, the appeal preferred by the petitioners before the
SDO has been dismissed on the ground of non-joinder of necessary parties.
It is this order which is under challenge in the instant writ petition.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner though places
reliance on the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Anand
Choudhary Vs. State of M.P. and others, reported in 2025 (1) M.P.L.J. 646
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: VANDANA
VERMA
Signing time: 30-Jan-26
10:43:00 AM
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:3502
3 WP-4365-2012
to contend that once the Will set up by the respondents was disputed, the
Tehsildar could not have passed an order of mutation on the basis of such
disputed Will. He further submits that in any case, if the revisional authority
was of the opinion that the appeal suffered from the vice of non-joinder of
necessary parties, then at the best, an opportunity ought to have been granted
to the petitioners herein to implead the remaining parties as respondents in
the pending appeal, and the appeal itself could not have been dismissed in
entirety.
4. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the
respondents No. 1 to 5 submits that the appeal preferred by the petitioners
has not been decided by the first appellate authority (SDO) on merits and the
only relief claimed by the petitioners in the instant writ petition is quashme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.