SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1842

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anupama Raje – Appellant
Versus
Mahipal Singh Tomar – Respondent


Advocates:
Saket Agrawal,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEEPAK KHOT

th

ON THE 27 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 1056 of 2025 ANUPAMA RAJE Versus MAHIPAL SINGH TOMAR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Saket Agrawal - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Shubham Rai with Shri Rahul Diwaker, learned counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2.

Shri Rajesh Kumar Pandey, P.L. for the respondent/State.

WITH MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 1059 of 2025 ANUPAMA RAJE Versus MAHIPAL SINGH TOMAR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Saket Agrawal - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Shubham Rai with Shri Rahul Diwaker, learned counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2.

Shri Abhilash Kumar Dey - Advocate for the respondent no.4.

Shri Rajesh Kumar Pandey, P.L. for the respondent/State.

MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 1060 of 2025 ANUPAMA RAJE AND OTHERS Versus SUNITA TOMAR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Saket Agrawal - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Shubham Rai with Shri Rahul Diwaker, learned counsel for the respondent No.1.

Shri Vijay Kumar Soni, Advocate for respondents no.2 and 3.

Shri Rajesh Kumar Pandey, P.L. for the respondent/State.

ORDER As similar questions of law and facts are involved in M.C.C.No.1056/2025, M.C.C.No.1059/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top