IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ALOK AWASTHI CIVIL REVISION No. 119 of 2025 RANJEET SINGH AND OTHERS Versus UPEDNRA KUMAR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri A. K. Chitale, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Sandeep Kochatta, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Shri Manish Yadav, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Shri Tarun Pagare, learned Government Advocate for the respondent /

State. WITH CIVIL REVISION No. 173 of 2025 RANJEET SINGH AND OTHERS Versus UPENDRA KUMAR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri A. K. Chitale, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Sandeep Kochatta, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Shri Manish Yadav, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Shri Tarun Pagare, learned Government Advocate for the respondent /

State.

CIVIL REVISION No. 174 of 2025 RANJEET SINGH AND OTHERS Versus UPENDRA KUMAR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri A. K. Chitale, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Sandeep Kochatta, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Shri Manish Yadav, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Shri Tarun Pagare, learned Government Advocate for the respondent /

State.

HEARD ON : 27.11.2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 27.01.2026 .............................................................................................................................................

ORDER CIVIL REVISION NO.119 of 2025 The petitioners before this Court have filed the present revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 being aggrieved by the nd order dated 18.12.2024 passed by the II Additional Judge to the Court of st I Civil Judge, Class - I, Tarana, District - Ujjain in RCSA No.131A/2023, whereby the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC has been rejected.

CIVIL REVISION NO.173 of 2025

02. The petitioners before this Court have filed the present revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 being aggrieved by nd the order dated 18.12.2024 passed by the II Additional Judge to the Court st of I Civil Judge, Class - I, Tarana, District - Ujjain in RCSA No.128A/2023, whereby the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC has been rejected.

CIVIL REVISION NO.174 of 2025

03. The petitioners before this Court have filed the present revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 being aggrieved by nd the order dated 18.12.2024 passed by the II Additional Judge to the Court st of I Civil Judge, Class - I, Tarana, District - Ujjain in RCSA No.133A/2023, whereby the application filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC has been rejected.

04. Regard being had to the similitude of the controversy involved in these civil revisions, with the joint request of the parties, these revisions are analogously heard and being decided by this common order.

FACTS OF THE CASE IN BRIEF

05. Respondent No.1 / plaintiff filed a civil suit i.e. Civil Suit No.131A/2023 seeking declaration of title and perpetual injunction in respect of the property bearing Survey No.143 area 2.460 hectare, Patwari Halka No.13 (old No.72) situated at Tehsil - Tarana, District - Ujjain. Furthermore, the plaintiff has sought relief that mutation proceedings in terms of order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer in Case No.56/Appeal/21-22 be declared as null and void. Relief to the extent that sale deed executed by defendants No.3 & 4 in favour of defendant No.5 and subsequent sale by defendant No.5 in favour of defendants No.6 & 7 be declared as null and void was also sought.

5.1. Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.1 & 2 are the real brother. In the year 1972, defendant No.1 filed Civil Suit No.34A/1972 seeking his share in the ancestral property, which was decreed on a compromise and he has received agricultural land admeasuring 11.34 hectare. However, the land allotted to defendant No.1 is not the part of subject property.

5.2. After the death of Shri Pratap Singh Nigam on 15.03.1986, names of three sons i.e. Ranjeet Singh, Upendra Kumar & Jitendra along with deceased's wife namely Smt. Chandrakanta Bai