SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1875

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Lalpati – Appellant
Versus
Omprakash – Respondent


Advocates:
Santosh Agrawal,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA

th

ON THE 27 OF JANUARY, 2026 SECOND APPEAL No. 895 of 2019 LALPATI AND OTHERS Versus OMPRAKASH Appearance:

Shri Santosh Agrawal - Advocate for the appellants.

Shri Sanjay Kumar Sharma- Advocate for the respondent.

ORDER This second appeal under Section 100 of CPC has been filed against judgment and decree dated 20/12/2018 passed by First Additional District Judge, Sabalgarh, District, Morena in Regular Civil Appeal No.680/2016, by which judgment and decree dated 08/09/2016 passed by Additional Judge to the Court of Civil Judge, Class-I, Sabalgarh, District, Morena in Civil Suit No.57-A/2014 has been reversed, and the suit filed by respondent/plaintiff has been partially decreed.

2. Facts necessary for disposal of present appeal, in short, are that plaintiff/respondent filed a suit for permanent injunction. It was his case that he is the owner and in possession of Survey No.125, area 5 Bigha 15 Biswa situated in village Katghar, Tehsil Sabalgarh, District, Morena, and the said property was described as disputed property. It was further claimed that the property in dispute is recorded in his name in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top