SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1888

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Harnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Govind Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
,J.P.S.Baghel,Arun Dudawat,Prashant Sharma,Sarvesh Sharma,Devendra Sharma,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH

th

ON THE 27 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 4460 of 2012 HARNAM SINGH AND OTHERS Versus GOVIND SINGH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Arun Dudawat - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Upendra Yadav - Advocate for the respondents No. 1 to 3.

ORDER

1. The instant writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 26.03.2012 passed in revision preferred by the respondents No.1,2 & 3 by Additional Collector, District Ashoknagar thereby, dismissing the first appeal preferred by the petitioners against the order of mutation dated 30.04.2011 passed by the Tehsildar, Mungawali. District Ashoknagar.

2. Brief facts leading to filing of the instant writ petition are as under:-

2.1 On the strength of a Will executed in favour of the respondents No.

1 to 3 in respect of land bearing survey No.16A admeasuring 1.829 hectare situated at village Pandau by one Smt. Ramkunwar Bai, an application under Sections 109 and 110 of M.P.Land Revenue Code, 1959 seeking mutation of the land in question came to be filed before the Tehsildar, Mungawali, District Ashoknagar. An object

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top