SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1891

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Achchhelal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Pramod Singh Tomar,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI

th

ON THE 27 OF JANUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 123 of 2011 ACHCHHELAL AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Pramod Singh Tomar - Advocate for the appellants.

Shri Manohar Meena - Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.

JUDGMENT This appeal has been filed by the appellants, namely, Achchhelal, Mulle and Kallu under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24.12.2010 passed by the VII Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), District Sagar (M.P.) in S.T. No.453/2010 whereby all the appellants have been convicted under Section 323/34 of IPC (05 counts) and sentenced to undergo R.I. for six months and to pay fine of Rs.300/- by each accused under each count, with default stipulations.

2. The prosecution case in brief is that complainant Pappu Yadav lodged a report (Ex.P/8) in Police Station Baraitha to the effect that on 2/2/2010 he was going to load bricks in the tractor. When his tractor was passing through the field of Malli Yadav, Malli Yadav abused him, and when he objected, Kallu and Neeraj came and K

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top