SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1901

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Moh.Sajid – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
CRR 108/2026



Advocates:
Neeraj Kumar Soni[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH ON THE 23rd OF JANUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6163 of 2025 MOHD. ZAKIR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri L.N. Soni – learned Senior Advocate with Shri Anand Soni –

Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

WITH CRIMINAL REVISION No. 5922 of 2025 ABHAY RATHORE Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Vivek Dalal with Shri Manav Beniwal – Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 5993 of 2025 ABHAY RATHORE Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Vivek Dalal with Shri Manav Beniwal – Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 5994 of 2025 ABHAY RATHORE Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Vivek Dalal with Shri Manav Beniwal – Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 5995 of 2025 ABHAY RATHORE Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Vivek Dalal with Shri Manav Beniwal – Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 5997 of 2025 ABHAY RATHORE Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Vivek Dalal with Shri Manav Beniwal – Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6014 of 2025 MOH.SAJID Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Neeraj Kumar Soni – Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6019 of 2025 MOH.SAJID Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Neeraj Kumar Soni – Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6020 of 2025 MOH.SAJID Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Neeraj Kumar Soni – Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6056 of 2025 ABHAY RATHORE Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Vivek Dalal with Shri Manav Beniwal – Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6107 of 2025 MOHD. ZAKIR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri L.N. Soni – learned Senior Advocate with Shri Anand Soni –

Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6117 of 2025 MOHD. ZAKIR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri L.N. Soni – learned Senior Advocate with Shri Anand Soni –

Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6118 of 2025 MOHD. ZAKIR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri L.N. Soni – learned Senior Advocate with Shri Anand Soni –

Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6120 of 2025 MOHD. ZAKIR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri L.N. Soni – learned Senior Advocate with Shri Anand Soni –

Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6144 of 2025 MOHD. ZAKIR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri L.N. Soni – learned Senior Advocate with Shri Anand Soni –

Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 6162 of 2025 MOHD. ZAKIR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri L.N. Soni – learned Senior Advocate with Shri Anand Soni –

Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

CRIMINAL REVISION No. 108 of 2026 MOH.SAJID Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Neeraj Kumar Soni – Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rahul Solanki – G.A. for the respondent/State.

ORDER

Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy involved in these criminal revisions, therefore, these criminal revisions have been analogo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top