SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1945

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mahesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mohit Pandya[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA

nd

ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 2575 of 2026 MAHESH KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Mohit Pandya - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Kushal Goyal -Deputy Advocate General for the respondent/State.

ORDER This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article

226 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs:

"(i) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent bank to immediately unfreeze the petitioner’s bank accounts.

(ii) Direct the respondent bank to provide a written and reasoned order/communication explaining the grounds of freezing of the account.

(iii) To issue any other writ or grant any other relief that this Hon'ble Court deems fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in the case of Malcolm Murayis & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India and Others Malcolm Murayis & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India and Others passed in W.P.

No.1100 of 2024 dated 26.04.20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top