SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1953

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vijay @ Julee @ Chhotu Vishwakarma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
CRR 6076/2025



Advocates:
Gyanendra Singh Baghel[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR CRR No. 6076 of 2025 (VIJAY @ JULEE @ CHHOTU VISHWAKARMA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH )

Dated : 02-02-2026 Shri G.S. Baghel - Advocate for the applicant.

Ms. Samta Jain - Government Advocate for State of M.P.

Record is received.

Heard on I.A. No.2374 of 2026, an application for condonation of delay of 5094 days.

On the consideration the delay is condoned.

Heard on admission.

The revision is admitted for final hearing.

Also heard on I.A. No.20033 of 2025 first application for suspension of remaining jail sentence and grant of bail.

This revision is filed against the judgment dated 29.9.2011 passed in Cr.A. No.58 of 2010 arising out of judgment dated 13.1.2010 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Chhindwara by which the applicant has been convicted and sentence to undergo R.I. for one year and fine of rs.500/- with default stipulation of two R.I. for two months under Section 25 (1-B) (A) of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is in jail from

18.11.2025 till today and if he is not released on bail, then the purpose of filing this revision would become futile. Therefore, it is prayed that execution of jail sentence of the applicant be suspended and he be released on bail.

Learned counsel for the respondent- State on the other hand supports the impugned judgment and opposes the prayer for suspension of sentence.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

After perusal of the record and hearing the arguments and the fact that final hearing of this revision may take time, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it proper to suspend the remaining jail sentence of the applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No.20033 of 2025 is allowed.

It is directed that subject of the fine amount in the trial court by the applicant and on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance before the Registry of this court on 27.4.2026 on the dates as may be fixed by the Registry of this Court the execution of remaining part of jail sentence imposed upon applicant shall remain suspended and he shall be released on bail till final disposal of the revision.

Applicant shall follow the conditions of Section 438 (3) for suspension of sentence as under:-

(a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed under this Chapter;

(b) that such person shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and, (c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

List the case for final hearing in due course.

C.C. as per rule.

(AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH)

JUDGE bks

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top