SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2012

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mansing – Appellant
Versus
Bhagirath – Respondent


Advocates:
Santosh Kumar Meshram[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 30 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 466 of 2026 MANSING AND OTHERS Versus BHAGIRATH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Santosh Kumar Meshram - Advocate for the petitioners.

ORDER The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated

14.01.2026 passed by the trial Court whereby the trial court has rejected application of the petitioner/plaintiff for amendment in the plaint, whereby the petitioner/plaintiff had sought to insert the relief of restoration of possession.

2. The trial court has rejected the said application on the ground that the application for restoration of possession has been filed after the evidence of both the parties has been completed and the case is at the stage of final arguments.

3. It has been considered by the trial court that both the parties have led their evidence on the basis of the pleadings as initially recorded and if at such a stage amendment is permitted then it would amount to framing issues afresh and then putting the case on a fresh trial. The trial court has further held that the petitioner has not shown due diligence in moving the application for am

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top