SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2068

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Romesh Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Naresh Shrivastava – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

th

ON THE 30 OF JANUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 9914 of 2016 ROMESH PANDEY Versus NARESH SHRIVASTAVA Appearance:

None for the parties.

ORDER Heard on I.A. No.11398/2016 - application under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay.

2. Considering the averments made in the application, supported by an affidavit of the applicant, I find that good and sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. Hence, the IA is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.

3. Heard on the application under Section 378(4) of CrPC for grant of leave to appeal. This application has been filed by the applicant against the judgment passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Rewa dated 29.04.2017 in R.T. No.2004/2009, whereby the learned trial Court has acquitted the respondent for the charge under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881.

4. Aforesaid criminal case was instituted on the basis of private complaint filed by the victim/applicant.

5. The question before this Court is whether instant appeal is covered under proviso to Section 413 of BNSS (372 of Cr.P.C.).

6. The aforesaid issue is no lon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top