HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rakesh Yaduwanshi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
CRA 4074/2025
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:8139
1 CRA-4074-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI
th
ON THE 29 OF JANUARY, 2026
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4074 of 2025
RAKESH YADUWANSHI
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Appearance:
Shri Jagdish Prasad Singrol - Advocate for the appellant.
Shri Aditya Choubey - Government Advocate for the respondent/State.
JUDGMENT
With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, heard finally.
This criminal appeal under Section 415(2) of BNSS, 2023/374 (2) of
Cr.P.C. has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of
sentence dated 06.03.2025 in S.T. No.24 of 23 passed by learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Junnardeo, District Chhindwara (MP) whereby the appellant
has been convicted for offence under Sections 323 and 326 of IPC but in
the light of Section 71 of IPC, sentenced the accused to suffer R.I. for 05
years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- under Section 326 of IPC instead of
conviction under Section 323 and 326 of IPC.
2 . The prosecution story in short is that Devram Yaduvanshi (PW-7) on
23.07.2023 got a written complaint registered at Police Station Navegaon,
District-Chhindwara (M.P.) that on the said date at 0600 a.m. his brother
Gajanand Yaduvanshi (PW-4) had gone to village Navegaon to distribute
milk. At around 10.00 a.m. Ramnath Yaduvanshi came home and told him
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: DINESH VERMA
Signing time: 03-02-2026
10:19:23
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:8139
2 CRA-4074-2025
that the accused had hit his brother Gajanand Yaduvanshi with a stick in
front of Ramesh Yaduvanshi's hotel located in village Navegaon, due to
which he suffered a head injury. On receiving the information, he reached
Ramesh Yaduvanshi's hotel located in village Navegaon and told him that at
around 7 a.m. his mother Gajanand had come to the hotel on a bicycle while
he was parking his bike. At the same time, the accused went with an iron
hammer in his hand and after abusing, he hit him on the head and threatened
to kill him. In the incident, Mukesh Saxena (PW-1)) and Ramesh
Yaduvanshi (PW-6) intervened. Due to the previous property/land dispute
between injured and the accused, the accused committed marpeet with the
injured. On the above basis, Sub-Inspector Mallu Kavade registered the case
as FIR No. 156/23 under Sections 294, 323, 324, 506 of IPC.
3 . After completion of the investigation, a charge-sheet was submitted in
the competent court, which, on its turn, committed the case to the court of
sessions from where it was made over to Additional Sessions Judge,
Junnardeo, District Chhindwara for trial.
4 . The learned Trial Judge on the basis of averments made against the
accused in the charge sheet framed charges punishable under Sections 294,
323, 326 and 506 (Par-II) of IPC. The accused abjured his guilt and claimed
to be tried. He took the plea that he has been falsely implicated in the
matter due to previous land dispute. However, he has not chosen to examine
any witness in his defence.
5. In order to bring home the charges, the prosecution examined as many
as 09 witnesses, which are Mukesh Saxena (PW-1), Anil Yaduvanshi (PW-
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: DINESH VERMA
Signing time: 03-02-2026
10:19:23
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:8139
3 CRA-4074-2025
2), Dr Roma Moolchandani (PW-3), Gajanand Yaduvanshi (PW-4), Ajabrao
Nirapure (PW-5), Ramesh Yaduvanshi (PW-6), Devram Yaduvanshi (PW-
7), ASI Maan Singh Baghel (PW-8) and Jaikesh Sahu (PW-9) and placed
Ex.P/1 to P/16 and Ex.D/1 to Ex.D/5 the documents on record.
6. The learned Trial Court after appreciating and marshalling the evidence
vide impugned judgment has acquitted the appellant of the offence under
Section 294 and 506-II of IPC but convicted him under Section 323 and 326
of IPC. The learned Trial Court in the light of Section 71 of IPC, sentenced
the accused to suffer R.I. for 05 years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- under
Section 326 of IPC. Hence, this appeal.
7. It is submitted by learned coun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.