SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2095

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Manoharlal Lohiya Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Omprakash Agrawal – Respondent


Advocates:
Jagdish Prasad Agrawal,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL

th

ON THE 29 OF JANUARY, 2026 SECOND APPEAL No. 261 of 2014 MANOHARLAL LOHIYA AGRAWAL Versus OMPRAKASH AGRAWAL Appearance:

Shri Shri Jagdish Prasad Agrawal, Advocate for appellant.

Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Arpit Agrawal, Advocate for respondent.

ORDER This second appeal has been preferred by the appellant/defendant/tenant challenging the judgment and decree dtd. 05.12.2013 passed by 3rd Additional District Judge, Tikamgarh in Regular Civil Appeal No.36A/2012 affirming the judgment and decree dtd. 20.10.2011 passed by 2nd Civil Judge Class-I, Tikamgarh in Civil Suit No.9A/2011 whereby both the Courts below have concurrently decreed the respondents (original plaintiff-Om Prakash Agrawal)' suit for eviction on the ground of bonafide requirement of son-Amit Kumar Agrawal available under Section 12(1)(f) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (in short "the Act").

2. Against the aforesaid judgment and decree passed by the Courts below, instant second appeal was filed and admitted by this Court for final hearing on 03.07.2014 on the following substantial questions of law:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top