HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rakesh Kumar Patel – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 36893/2023
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:8671
1 MCRC-36893-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI
th
ON THE 28 OF JANUARY, 2026
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 36893 of 2023
RAKESH KUMAR PATEL
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri Sushil Kumar Sharma - Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Amit Garg - PL for the respondent-State.
Shri Krishna Pratap Singh - Advocate for the respondent no.2.
ORDER
The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure has been filed by the petitioner for quashment of the FIR
registered vide Crime No.116/2023 at Police Station Amarpatan, District
Satna, for the offence punishable under Sections 306/34 IPC, the charge-
sheet filed pursuant thereto, and the consequent proceedings pending before
the Court of First Additional Sessions Judge, Amarpatan, in Sessions Trial
No.20/2023.
2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case is that on 04.10.2022 one Nitesh
Patel died due to drowning in a dam. On the same day, a Marg was
registered at the instance of Gajadhar Prasad Patel, brother of the deceased,
wherein certain allegations were made against the present petitioner and
other co-accused persons. Subsequently, after a considerable delay, the FIR
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: 68a0eb5c-526b-
4cd2-b459-c24c3168a47d
Signing time: 02-02-2026
14:59:50
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:8671
2 MCRC-36893-2023
was registered on 18.03.2023 alleging that on account of political rivalry, the
petitioner along with other co-accused compelled the deceased to consume
alcohol heavily and thereafter instigated and abetted him to swim into the
dam with an intention to see him die, resulting in his death.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even if the entire
prosecution story is accepted on its face value, the essential ingredients of
Section 306 IPC are not made out. It is contended that there is no specific
act, proximate instigation, or intentional aid attributable to the petitioner so
as to constitute abetment of suicide. It is further submitted that the
allegations are vague, omnibus and highly improbable, and the delayed
registration of FIR clearly reflects afterthought and embellishment. Hence,
continuation of criminal proceedings would amount to abuse of the process
of law.
4. Learned State counsel opposed the petition and submitted that the
allegations disclose a prima facie case and the matter should be left for trial.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 opposes the petition
submitting that the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure deserves outright dismissal, as it seeks premature
evaluation of disputed facts and appreciation of evidence, which is wholly
impermissible in exercise of inherent jurisdiction. The prosecution case
clearly discloses that the deceased Nitesh Patel died on 04.10.2022 after
being systematically harassed, compelled to consume excessive alcohol and
thereafter deliberately instigated and abetted by the present petitioner and
other co-accused persons to swim into the dam with a clear and conscious
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: 68a0eb5c-526b-
4cd2-b459-c24c3168a47d
Signing time: 02-02-2026
14:59:50
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:8671
3 MCRC-36893-2023
intention to see him die. The acts complained of are not isolated or
innocuous, but are part of a concerted design arising out of political rivalry,
squarely attracting Sections 306 and 34 IPC.
6. As regards the delay in registration of FIR, the counsel for the State
as well respondent No. 2 submitted that delay by itself is not fatal,
particularly in cases involving unnatural death. Initially, a Marg was
registered on time containing allegations against the petitioner and other co-
accused persons and the family of the deceased was under shock and trauma.
The FIR was registered only after further facts came to light during inquiry,
which fully explains the time gap. The delay has already been accounted for
in the charge-sheet and cannot b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.