HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Aman Singh – Appellant
Versus
Umashankar – Respondent
MA 577/2016
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:3490
1 MA-577-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH
ON THE 28th OF JANUARY, 2026
MISC. APPEAL No. 577 of 2016
AMAN SINGH AND OTHERS
Versus
UMASHANKAR AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri Anuraj Saxena- Advocate for appellants/claimant.
Shri Bal Krishna Agrawal- Advocate for respondent No.3/Insurance Company.
Shri Pawan Singh Raghuvansh-Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
ORDER
The present matter pertains to a miscellaneous appeal under Section 173 of the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the Award dated 21/04/2015 passed by the
Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, District Vidisha (M.P.) in Motor Accident
Claim Case No.93/2013.
2.The appellants/claimants seek condonation of delay in filing the present appeal
by way of an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (I.A. No.
2464/2016). It is submitted that the delay has occurred on account of bonafide reasons.
The appellants are rustic villagers and have no knowledge of law or legal proceedings.
It is further submitted that appellant No. 3 had received the certified copy of the
impugned award along with the office file of the case from the office of Shri Rakesh
Yadav, Advocate, Vidisha, District Vidisha (M.P.) in May 2015. However, due to
family problems, the said office file along with the certified copy of the impugned
award was misplaced from the office of the appellant No.3. It is further submitted that
appellant No. 3 thereafter recollected the case details and applied for a certified copy of
the award dated 21.04.2015 on 28.04.2016, which was made available on 04.05.2016.
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PRACHI MISHRA
Signing time: 1/31/2026
12:50:49 PM
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:3490
2 MA-577-2016
Thereafter, appellant No. 3 contacted Shri J. P. Mishra, Advocate, Gwalior (M.P.), for
preparation of the present appeal, and the same was thereafter filed before this Hon’ble
Court. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is prayed that the delay in
filing the present appeal be condoned in the interest of justice.
3. Counsel for the respondent Nos 1 to 3 opposed the application for
condonation of delay on the grounds that the appellants have failed to explain the delay
adequately. Appellants were aware of the order passed by Claims Tribunal and
subsequent legal proceedings, yet they have not acted with due diligence in filing the
appeal within the prescribed period. It is further contended that the delay in filing the
appeal is substantial and no valid or sufficient explanation has been provided to justify
such a long delay.
4. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
5.The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has consistently held that the provisions
of the Limitation Act are not merely procedural but are intended to prevent inordinate
delay in the administration of justice. In the case of Collector, Land Acquisition vs.
Mst. Katiji, reported in (1987) 2 SCC 107, the Hon'ble Apex Court reiterated that the
expression "sufficient cause" should be liberally construed to advance substantial
justice, particularly in matters where the rights of parties are at stake. However, the
Court also emphasized that the delay should not be condoned in a routine manner, and
a party seeking condonation must demonstrate sufficient and reasonable cause. Further,
in the case of N. Balakrishnan vs. M. Krishnamurthy, reported in (1998) 7 SCC 123,
the Hon'ble Apex Court emphasized that delay should not be condoned unless there is a
reasonable explanation for the same. It was observed that in cases where an applicant
fails to show that the delay was caused due to circumstances beyond their control, the
courts are not bound to condone the delay.
6. In the present case, the explanation furnished by the appellants does not
inspire confidence. The plea regarding misplacement of the case file and certified copy
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: PRACHI MISHRA
Signing time: 1/31/2026
12:50:49 PM
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-GWL:3490
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.