HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Dr. Rohit Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
WP 17431/2014
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:8516
1 WP-17431-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL
th
ON THE 28 OF JANUARY, 2026
WRIT PETITION No. 17431 of 2014
DR. ROHIT SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Appearance:
Shri Pankaj Dubey - Advocate with Shri Akshay Khandelwal -
Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Ritwik Parashar - Government Advocate for the
respondent/State.
ORDER
Per: Justice Vivek Rusia
The petitioner has filed this present writ petition challenging the order
dated 28.10.2014 (Annexure P-8) whereby the respondents Nos 1 and 2 have
rejected his representation for the release of the original documents of the
petitioner and have posted him to District Hospital, Jhabua, for a period of 1
year.
2. The facts of the case, in short, are as follows:-
(a) The petitioner completed his M.B.B.S in the year 2007. Thereafter,
he completed his one-year internship and was awarded the degree of
M.B.B.S. He then appeared in the entrance test to take admission in the
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: TARUN KUMAR
SALUNKE
Signing time: 02-02-2026
14:26:01
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:8516
2 WP-17431-2014
Postgraduate Course, i.e., M.D./M.S., in the academic session 2010-11. The
petitioner was selected and admitted to the M.G.M Medical College, Indore,
in the department of Anaesthesiology. The petitioner has executed a Bond
(Annexure P-1) for working in rural/ remote areas of this State (other than
the city and areas attached to the major cities) after completion of the PG
degree. The petitioner deposited the original mark sheets and documents with
the respondent no.4 till become free from the bond and issuance of NOC.
The petitioner completed the PG course in the year 2011, and the result was
declared on 15.07.2011 (Annexure P-3).
(b) According to the petitioner, he was expecting his rural posting
order, but no order was issued by the respondent no.3 till date of passing of
the impugned order. According to the petitioner, as per Rule 1.12 of the
Examination and Conduct Rules, 2009-10, if a posting order is not issued
within 3 months from the date of declaration of result, the bond will
automatically be deemed cancelled. Since the appointment order was not
issued for rural posting; therefore, the petitioner is free from the bond
conditions and entitled to get back his original documents. The petitioner
filed W.P No. 936/2014 before this Court. Vide order dated 04.02.2014
(Annexure P-6), the Court directed the respondents to decide his
representation. In compliance of the aforesaid direction, the respondent no.3
did not pass an order; therefore, the petitioner filed contempt petition No.
1499/2014 before this Court. According to the petitioner, the contemnors got
annoyed after receipt of the notice of contempt, hence vide order dated
28.10.2014 (Annexure P-8), the representation of the petitioner has been
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: TARUN KUMAR
SALUNKE
Signing time: 02-02-2026
14:26:01
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:8516
3 WP-17431-2014
rejected and he has been directed to join as P.G doctor in District Hospital,
Jhabua. The petitioner by way of this petition is seeking following relief as
well as interim relief:-
"(i) To quash the order dated 28.10.2014 (Annexure P-8);
(ii) To direct the respondents to grant the NOC in favour of the petitioner and release
the original documents and mark sheets retained by them.
(iii) Grant any other relief as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of this case.
8. Interim order/writ:
It is respectfully submitted that the petitioner is hopeful of succeeding in the case
and therefore during the pendency of the instant Writ Petition this hon’ble court may
kindly be pleased to stay the effect of impugned order dated 28/10/2014 (Annexure
P-8)."
3. While issuing notice to the respondents, this Court has not stayed
the posting order; therefore, in consequence of it, the petitioner ought to have
worked for one year in a rural area in Jhabu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.