SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2124

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Anil Pal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Rudra Pratap Singh Kaurav[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE

nd

ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 220 of 2026 ANIL PAL Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Romesh Pratap Singh - Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms Anjalai Gyanani Ga appearing on behalf of Advocate General[r-1].

Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, learned counsel for the respondent [R-2].

ORDER By invoking inherent powers of this Court, the present petition has been preferred by petitioner under Section 528 of BNSS/482 of Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of FIR bearing Crime No.227/2022 registered at Police Station Pandokhar, District Datia for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 376 (2) (n) of IPC and section 3, 4, 5 (j) (ii), 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 and other subsequent criminal proceedings initiated therefrom.

2. Alongwith the petition, both the parties have filed I.A. Nos.59/2026 and 60/2026 stating therein that the dispute between the parties has been resolved and they have entered into compromise with no intention to pursue the matter further. It is further submitted that petitioner and respondent No. 2 are presently living together as husband and wife. They

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top