SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2149

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Nandkishor – Appellant
Versus
Lucky @ Laxman Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Anup Tiwari,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH ON THE 2nd OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 1204 of 2016 NANDKISHOR AND OTHERS Versus LUCKY @ LAXMAN SINGH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sanjeev Tiwari - Advocate for the appellants.

Shri Bal Krishna Agrawal- Advocate for respondent No.3.

ORDER The present matter pertains to a miscellaneous appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the Award dated 30.01.2016 passed by Second Additional Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dabra, Gwalior (M.P.) in Motor Accident Claim Case No.25/2014.

2. The appellants seeks condonation of delay in filing the present appeal by way of an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (1.A. No. 36/2017). It is submitted that the delay has occurred on account of bona fide reasons. The delay of 206 days in filing the miscellaneous appeal occurred due to the appellant's bona fide lack of knowledge about the award dated 30.01.2016, as the previously engaged advocate failed to inform the applicant about its passing. The appellant came to know about the award only on 19.11.2016 and immediately thereafter took prompt steps to file the appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top